Over the last decade, we have seen some major shifts in the public school system. Curriculum has been redesigned to accommodate Common Core standards, replacing tried and true teaching techniques, and students are being taught about LGBTQ+ ideology instead of learning about the founding documents of our country. Many parents are starting to consider alternative options for their child’s education, including the private and charter schools that North Carolina has to offer.
This week on Family Policy Matters, host Traci DeVette Griggs welcomes Robert Luddy, entrepreneur and founder of Thales Academy, to discuss some of the educational options in North Carolina and the many advantages they offer.
This episode is a part of a series highlighting the school choice movement across North Carolina. Tune in each week to learn more!
- Subscribe to our podcast, so you can hear our interviews every week. Search on your preferred podcast app for: “NC Family’s Family Policy Matters” podcast.
- Tune in to one of the radio stations that carry Family Policy Matters
- Click below to listen online.
Spotify • Apple Podcasts • iHeart Radio • Audacy • Amazon Music
Family Policy Matters
Transcript: What’s Happened In the North Carolina General Assembly So Far This Year
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Thanks for joining us today for Family Policy Matters. We are recording this interview for both the radio show and podcast and NC Family’s weekly video updates. If you’re interested in seeing the video version of this interview, sign up as part of our email list at NCfamily.org and you will receive an email when they are online every week. Our guests today are here to give us an update on this session of the North Carolina General Assembly. John Rustin is president of NC Family and Jerry Royall is NC Family’s Counsel. Both spend a lot of time at the General Assembly keeping an eye on what’s happening and working to influence laws on behalf of the families in our state. It’s amazing that when you hear about all of these important bills in the media, they’re portrayed as radical. But as we know when we actually read the text of the bills, which of course are always available to us on the NC legislature’s website at ncleg.gov, we find they’re actually common sense and reasonable. So let’s talk about some of those bills. Well, let’s talk first about a victory. There was a pro life victory in the legislature. What happened?
JOHN RUSTIN
Yes, well, there was and hopefully as you’re aware, we have had a great pro life victory in North Carolina. Senate Bill 20—The Care for Women, Children, and Families Act was passed by the legislature, of course was vetoed by Governor Roy Cooper, and the legislature overrode the governor’s veto. This bill is a major pro life victory in North Carolina. It essentially reduces the gestational age for illegal abortions in North Carolina from 20 weeks to 12 weeks. Of course, at the onset of the session, we were advocating strongly for a heartbeat bill in North Carolina, which would have reduced the legal gestational age for abortion about six weeks, it was clear as this bill and discussions were going on in both the House and the Senate, that that just was unfortunately not going to happen, and so they settled on 12 weeks. But this bill contains a lot of other provisions that will protect life in North Carolina, and also that will provide resources to give women and families that are facing crisis and unplanned pregnancies every reason to choose life instead of choosing abortion. Jere, do you have any other perspective?
JERE ROYALL
As you said, yeah, that was a compromise. We obviously wanted, and many others wanted, conception to be the time when the unborn child is protected. But there were a lot of good provisions that were added along with the 12 week restriction.
JOHN RUSTIN
And Traci, this bill is is literally going to save thousands of lives every year, and is going to again, provide resources. There’s $160 million dollars appropriated in this bill for improvements and enhancements to foster care, to adoption, to maternal care and lots of other important services in North Carolina, again, to give women and families that are facing crisis and unplanned pregnancies every reason to choose life. And so we’re really excited about it.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Yeah, and I think it answers some of those critiques from the other side that all we care about is getting the baby born. So this is providing a lot of those services.
JOHN RUSTIN
Absolutely, absolutely. And that’s so critical, because there are going to be more and more women carrying a child to term and we need to provide those practical services to them and also support in lots of different ways. So yeah.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Well let’s talk about going forward, then, there are a lot of bills that are important to North Carolina families that are being considered, talk about what those are.
JOHN RUSTIN
Well, a major bill is the Parents’ Bill of Rights, which I know a lot of our viewers and listeners care about. This bill clarifies and codifies parents fundamental rights to the care, custody, and control – using kind of legal terms – of their children, particularly in the arenas of education and health care. So this bill, Senate Bill 49, passed the Senate in early February and is awaiting action in the House. And we’re very, very hopeful that the house is going to take this bill up and pass it because parents do have a fundamental right to the care and upbringing of their children. But because that’s being challenged in lots of areas, especially in education and in health care, this bill does need to pass.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Okay, how about Opportunity Scholarships?
JERE ROYALL
Well, this is an area where more and more people are realizing we need to offer choices in education, and there’s great support across the state for this. So both chambers, the House and the Senate have bills proposing that. The House actually passed their version, the Senate version was not voted on, would expand things even more. Their’s actually would include all income levels. Now it would be on a sliding scale, the amount of these grants, but because the bill has not been taken up, many people are talking about the fact that it will be put in the state budget, which is what has happened in recent years. But either way, there is going to be a significant expansion of the scholarship grants, not an unlimited amount, but they are going to continue to increase the availability of these scholarships.
JOHN RUSTIN
Yeah, so expanding eligibility, so more children, more families will be able to choose the educational environment that’s best for their children, and also forward funding as the legislature is done so that there are appropriations set aside for Opportunity Scholarships for years in advance. So we’re really excited about this initiative, and the legislature is really continuing making North Carolina one of the leading states in the nation in school choice.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
So this is what critics have hammered on is the all income levels, that you’re going to be providing these scholarships, which have in the past may have been for people who are low income or who’ve had special needs children. So now we’re giving scholarships and taking these rich kids and paying for them to go to private schools. What’s the truth in that?
JERE ROYALL
Well, I mean it is but it’s on a sliding scale. But the reality is people are saying taxpayers are putting money into the state fund, and so it only makes sense that if people are choosing for their children to take another path that some of those resources should follow the child. I understand your point people are making but the reality is doesn’t it make sense to let resources but not as much of the state resources follow the child as they go to various schools?
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Okay. The next one, I think is Fairness in Women’s Sports Act.
JOHN RUSTIN
Yes, and this bill is really designed to protect the health and safety of female athletes in middle school, high school, and college by designating sports teams as either male, female or CO Ed based on biological sex. And so there were similar bills introduced in both the State Senate and the State House, those bills passed their chamber of origin. So the Senate bill passed the Senate, the House bill passed the House, but neither chamber has taken up the other chambers bill yet. So since there is clearly support in both chambers for this legislation, we fully anticipate that this bill will be taken up in either the House or the Senate, and that bill will be passed.
JERE ROYALL
Quick note on that, John, that doesn’t normally happen. Usually, one chamber passes a bill sends it over to the other. In this case, as you say they did pass their own version. The main difference is the House version includes college sports, so it remains to be seen how they’re going to work out that difference.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Okay, so this is primarily about transgender individuals trying to play on a sport that doesn’t match their birth gender. So we’ve got another bill that’s similar prohibiting gender surgeries on minors. What’s happening with that?
JOHN RUSTIN
Right, well, this is House Bill 808, which passed the House in early May, has not been considered by the Senate yet. The original version of this bill, and there’s a companion Senate bill, would prohibit the administration of puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, and the performance of gender reassignment surgeries on minors in North Carolina. So the House took up their bill, they took out the puberty blockers or the chemical portions and kept it as just prohibiting cross sex surgeries on minors and sent that bill over to the Senate. We’re hopeful that the Senate will take up their version of the bill or reinstate the chemical treatment prohibition as part of this bill. Because these drugs, these chemicals, and these surgical procedures are irreversible and sterilize the individuals who receive these services. And it’s just not a good thing for especially our youth to be subjected to. And so individuals who are dealing with gender dysphoria certainly need support, they need compassion, they need care, but they don’t need irreversible surgeries and chemicals in their bodies.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Okay, so these two bills are not proof that Republicans hate transgender individuals, is that what you’re saying?
JOHN RUSTIN
Yes, that is correct.
JERE ROYALL
It is, it’s showing true care for people. As John said, they’re permanent changes. There’s no proof. I mean, more and more. We’ve seen it over in Europe, other parts of the world that they’ve been on this path and have seen, they’re coming with negative outcomes. This is bringing harm to people’s lives. So it is, it’s really showing compassion. One other quick note too, John, it remains to be seen how their work out the difference, the House version did still have a provision in there, even though it didn’t keep the chemical part, where no state funding would go towards any kinds of treatments.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Yeah, it is interesting that the United States is doing much more radical things with individuals who believe themselves to be transgender than even European countries. Some of these countries we expect to be far out there.
JOHN RUSTIN
And Traci, in a related bill, there’s also legislation that would protect the rights of conscience of healthcare providers in North Carolina. It’s a very broad bill, but part of the intention of the bill is to address and protect physicians and others in the healthcare industry from being forced to engage and participate in these kinds of administration of drugs and surgeries on minors. So that is House Bill 819, the Medical Ethics Defense Act. We do have conscience protections in North Carolina protecting doctors, physicians, health care providers from participating in abortions. And this would extend that in a much broader sense. So we are hopeful that this bill will be taken up because that’s really important not only to prohibit minors from participating, but if adults are seeking these kinds of treatments that, if a healthcare provider objects to it on religious, ethical or moral grounds, they should not be forced to participate in it. So another important bill.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Okay. So the final one that our organization is watching is called The REACH Act, and as someone who loves history and thinks that we all need to learn more about our Founding Fathers and some of the founding documents, I love this one. But explain what that is.
JOHN RUSTIN
Well, The REACH Act would require three credit hours of instruction on American government and our founding documents as a prerequisite for graduation from North Carolina universities and community colleges. So the title of the bill is Reclaiming College Education on America’s Constitutional Heritage, the acronym for that is REACH, so that’s where The REACH Act comes from. And there were bills introduced in both chambers to do this. There have been discussions, but no final action taken yet on this legislation by the General Assembly.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Right, and why is this important?
JERE ROYALL
Well, as we’re seeing now, they’ve done surveys and asked people basic questions about government. And sadly, the responses are almost shocking. And this is where people are going, “Okay, we see this is a problem.” As citizens of this country, we need to understand our system of government, we all need to participate. And that’s what course we’re about. And we appreciate the fact that so many of you work together with us within our government. But if people don’t understand how the government system works, they’re not as likely to be involved and interested. And so this is an important part of helping people see what does it mean to be a citizen of this country, of this state?
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Right. And I think this is why it’s important for all of us to be an educated electorate. This is why getting involved with NC Family, signing up for those emails and actually reading them when they go into your email box is important because you’re continuing to educate yourself and how you can be active.
JOHN RUSTIN
We’ve got a couple more issues to talk about. I know we’re running short on time. Of course, gambling has been a huge focus of the legislature. Unfortunately in recent weeks, as we are having our discussion today, the sports gambling and horse racing bill has passed the General Assembly and has been sent to the governor. He is expected to sign the bill in the coming days. And it’s just very unfortunate because we know the tremendously negative impact that the legalization of sports gambling in North Carolina is going to have, especially on our young adults and youth. The legislature is also considering bills and discussing bills that would place casinos in North Carolina and also legalize Video Lottery terminals or basically video poker machines under the auspices of the state lottery, we are fighting these bills like the dickens and I’m just heartbroken to see the sports gambling bill and the horse racing bill pass the legislature. If this is an issue that is of concern to you, please keep your eyes and ears open for alerts from the Family Policy Council as we move further into the session, because these bills are likely to come up quite quickly.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
And then the last one is medical marijuana, which I think is just ridiculous that we’re actually still talking about this. We know all the evidence that shows that it’s not healthy to have this legalized marijuana. Talk about what’s happening in North Carolina.
JERE ROYALL
Well, it passed earlier this year in the Senate as the House has not brought it up yet. We and you and many others continue to inform our members of the legislature of the house, just as you’re saying Traci, about the realities. All major medical groups are saying, “No, let us be the ones who approve medications. This we’re finding harm, not help.” And again, thank you for your involvement, because the more they’re hearing, the more they’re being encouraged with the facts and the truth. We’re understanding that opposition is continuing to grow. So this coming week, we’ve heard they may be voting in the House within the caucus of Republicans where if it’s defeated there, then that will be the end of the bill, which is what needs to happen. So we all are going to keep working together to inform, encourage them which goes back to your whole point about being involved with government, looking out for our neighbor, caring for one another. This is one more way we can do that.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
And y’all it’s so valuable that we have these people up there, you know, advocating on our behalf. So thank you very much for all the good work that you guys do.
JOHN RUSTIN
Thank you, Traci. I appreciate that.
– END –
Spotify • Apple Podcasts • iHeart Radio • Audacy • Amazon Music
Family Policy Matters
Transcript: The Value of Having (School) Choices
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Thanks for joining us this week for Family Policy Matters. As a new school year approaches, we are excited to bring you a series of interviews that will look at the many phases of education here in North Carolina, which is considered a school choice leader in the nation.
Today we’re joined by Bob Luddy, a successful North Carolina business owner whose dedication to quality education led him to begin several different schools, one of the state’s first charter schools, an independent Catholic school, and most recently, Thales Academy, a private school that currently boasts 14 campuses in three states. He joins us today to take a closer look at the important role private schools play in North Carolina’s educational landscape. Bob Luddy, welcome to Family Policy Matters.
ROBERT LUDDY: Traci, it’s a delight to be with you today.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Talk first about why you decided to focus your philanthropic efforts on, of all things, K through 12 education.
ROBERT LUDDY: One of the things I noticed in the early and mid-90s was that while some students did okay in public education, many students were left behind. And I felt like they were being denied the American dream. So I wanted to do something about it, I tried various school reforms, not very successfully. And that led me to the Franklin Academy Public Charter School.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: You experienced both the charter, then, and private schools. Lay out the different roles that those types of schools play, as you see it, in North Carolina’s educational landscape.
ROBERT LUDDY: I’ve always viewed charter schools as a transitional opportunity. So the idea came up in Minnesota in the early 90s. Most of the states adopted some form of charters. And while they are a major improvement, because it allows for private initiative, there are also constraints from government regulation. And those constraints can be more difficult over a period of time. Whereas in private schools, in North Carolina, there’s no restrictions whatsoever, except that you have to follow all the laws of the state of North Carolina. So it allows for maximum creativity and initiative and improvement, where charters are a little bit more restrictive.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Well, clearly, since you are putting a lot of energy into the private school sector, talk about why you think that was an important direction for you to go, and also why you think parents and teachers are choosing private schools here in our state.
ROBERT LUDDY: Interestingly, around 2006, there weren’t any more charters available. So that’s what initially led me toward private, but as I became more involved in it I realized that we could do a better job in private schools because we’ve kind of eliminated all the restrictions by the state that had developed over many, many years. And that’s proven to be a very sound initiative.
So, for example, we use direct instruction, which is a phonics-based method of teaching reading. Classic curriculum that’s been around forever, but it’s been abandoned by too many schools, and we can maintain discipline and order more correctly in the private school than in the public setting.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Do you think those are the same reasons that parents are choosing private schools? Are there others?
ROBERT LUDDY: You know, initially, I think if you went back into the 90s, parents chose private schools, primarily faith-based, or they thought they were going to get a superior education, or both. If you fast forward to today, there’s a lot of propaganda being pushed at students in public schools. And there’s a large number of parents that are just trying to escape that propaganda and then concurrently gain a good academic education. So it’s a number of factors, and even safety today is more of a factor. It is generally perceived to be private schools are much safer than public schools.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: You mentioned about the classic curriculum, direct instruction, phonics, those are some things I think if you’re a little bit older, I’m very familiar with. Talk a little bit more about why going back to that type of instruction is very important.
ROBERT LUDDY: You know, in North Carolina, along with most of the other states, they developed, I think, going back to the 80s, this idea of whole language. So they stopped teaching phonics, and the result was currently, about half the students coming out of the public system don’t read on grade level, and that’s because they don’t understand phonics. Phonics gives you the basis of understanding and pronouncing words, and spelling words even that you’re not familiar with. So direct instruction takes it to another level where they stress pronunciation, phonics, continuous review, memorization, pretty much what school systems did over the last 100 years prior to the introduction of whole language.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Why do you suppose there is this push to get away from some of those tried and true methods?
ROBERT LUDDY: That’s the million-dollar question. I think that universities try to be creative. But the problem is, in our business and industry, when we try to be creative, we do extensive testing to see if it makes any sense. In the case of many of these ideas, like whole language or common core, there’s absolutely no real testing. So bad ideas can come into the market under the guise of creativity.
I think the whole idea of stressing creativity over basic teaching methodology has been a huge mistake. There are some who believe that charter schools should only be commissioned if they can show they have a creative approach to education. And my approach is more like we would’ve done things 100 years ago. Structured discipline, love of students, learn to mastery, use all the basic techniques such as phonics that make sense a thousand years from now,
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: You know, you’ll also mention the number of students who are not reading on grade level, you would get the impression from state and national leaders that it was due to COVID. But it sounds like to me that you say it is not.
ROBERT LUDDY: No, it became far worse under COVID, but it existed a long time before that. As a matter of fact, you can go back to 1983. The report to Reagan, the Nation at Risk. There’s been school reform after school reform in North Carolina dating back into the 90s. And none of them have worked because they bring untried solutions. Recently I noted that North Carolina is retraining 44,000 teachers to learn and teach phonics. So think, after 30 years of failure, they’re finally going to make a reversal. But that might take 20 more years.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: So why do you suppose you can make your schools safer, you mentioned safety as something that you guys were able to handle better.
ROBERT LUDDY: I think it begins with discipline in the school. So if a student is of concern, we take action. Ultimately, if it’s a student that we cannot manage, we can push them out of the school, whereas in the public system, that’s more difficult to do. So if the students are well managed, and then you move to the facility, we do everything possible in the facility, for example, all exterior doors are locked. We have cameras, interior and exterior, and they are monitored continuously by our administrative team. Our teachers are paying attention and resolute for problems that may occur.
So we do everything physically possible. But we don’t generate problems internally. And you see this in a number of schools, those problems germinated in the family and in the school, and then they turned into a disaster. We’re paying attention to that continuously. To me, that is probably even a bigger factor than all the safety precautions, all of which are important, but making sure that you’re not generating problems or people that are so frustrated that they’re going to do something really seriously bad.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Let’s talk a little bit about school policies. You’ve been so involved in politics and policy over the years, and I know you mentioned the restrictions, many restrictions over charter schools, which of course, we know are public schools. So talk a little bit about, from your perspective, what some of the most important changes in North Carolina’s school choice policies have been over the last 30 years.
ROBERT LUDDY: If you go back 30 years, essentially, we had no school choice. So in 1996, the charter school bill was passed. That was the beginning but it was restricted to 100 charter schools. Somewhere way later, I think it was 2010, that restriction was lifted, and in 2015, we had the beginning of the North Carolina Opportunity Scholarships for private schools. That was a big step forward and had to go through the Supreme Court, the best policy the state could have would be to have all private schools and stay out of the policy business because today, parents are much more informed than they would have been years ago. There’s homeschoolers that have a myriad of curriculum and organizations. There’s a whole range of private schools, there’s books written on this. So I think what the state needs to do is trust the parents, and the parents care more about their children than anybody on the planet, and they’re going to do everything they can for a great outcome. So if there’s some exceptions where the outcome wasn’t great, that’s not the purview of the state, it’s still the parents. So any policy you need is to trust the parents, liberate education, let the private sector take it over, and it will be stellar over time.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Okay, so you’re suggesting, then, that we do away with public schools altogether? And I can just hear people saying it’s going to create socio-economic and racial barriers. Talk about that. Why would you see that as not being the case?
ROBERT LUDDY: Well, as I understand it, prior to 1920, there was no requirement for compulsory education, you had something like 95% of the individuals from the US were literate at some range. It ignores the fact that the private sector has every capability of teaching every single student. I mean, in direct instruction, the essential model says we can teach any student to read. Some may take a little longer to teach than others, but every student can learn to read. With only 50% of the students in public school reading on grade level, that’s a prima facia case for saying the failure rate is enormously high. If their failure rate was 2%, you can say, well, that’s great. 50% is completely unacceptable. And what we know with private initiatives, people will stay on it until they make it happen. And I would suggest that all students would be better off under private initiative, versus the think tanks and the government and the policies, all of which have been a failure.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Talk to parents who might be listening to this and thinking to themselves, if I could swing the money, I would love to have my child in a private school, how would you advise them to move forward?
ROBERT LUDDY: I think they have to look at everything. So they can get a recommendation from other parents, but that’s not final because those parents may have a different child, a different subset of values. I would look at test scores if they’re available, I would talk to a lot of parents, I would go to the school and look physically, what does the school look like? What does the curriculum look like? So I would do as much investigation as possible. And I think it’s generally true when parents do that, they normally make the best decision for their own children.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Are there other things, besides what you’ve already mentioned, that you think North Carolina needs to do regarding education policy, as it relates to private schools?
ROBERT LUDDY: The best policy for private schools is to do nothing. And if you look at the current statute, private schools fall under the Department of Administration. And the only requirement is that you follow all state laws, that you notify the Department of Administration that you’re opening a private school and that you send your test scores to the Department of Administration, you know, a nationally normed test score. You could add to that, that you publish them online so that everybody knows what those scores are and what kind of testing you took. But that’s about it. If you think of any competitive industry, over time, the stronger providers are going to prevail. And you will see the same thing happen in schools.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Do you have some recommendations for more resources, where people who are listening can learn more about educational approaches and policies as you’ve discussed them, and where our listeners, of course, can learn more about Thales Academy,
ROBERT LUDDY: Just today, The Thales Way book was introduced, so Thales Way states in some great detail exactly what we do at Thales Academy. It’s available on Amazon online for maybe $10. Also, if you Google educational choice, there’s a myriad of organizations that write on school choice, that provide recommendations, that have steady reports. So the information is all out there on the web. The purpose of The Thales Way is to say this is what Thales does. There’s other ways of teaching, but this is what we do, and this is what we think is important.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: All right, Bob Luddy, founder of Thales Academy, a private school that has 14 campuses in three states, thank you so much for being with us today on Family Policy Matters.
– END –