The last 200 years have seen several significant waves of the feminist movement. From securing for women the right to vote to advocating for equal pay, feminists have worked hard to bridge the gap between men and women. While some of these efforts have been beneficial, the movement has had several unintended consequences that are becoming painfully obvious.
This week on Family Policy Matters, host Traci DeVette Griggs welcomes Dr. Carrie Gress, a Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and author of the new book The End of Woman: How Smashing the Patriarchy Has Destroyed Us, to discuss the damage that the feminist movement has done over the last two centuries.
- Subscribe to our podcast so you can hear our interviews every week. Search on your preferred podcast app for: “NC Family’s Family Policy Matters” podcast.
- Tune in to one of the radio stations that carry Family Policy Matters
- Click below to listen online.
Spotify • Apple Podcasts • iHeart Radio • Audacy • Amazon Music
Family Policy Matters
Transcript: What’s Happened In the North Carolina General Assembly So Far This Year
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Thanks for joining us today for Family Policy Matters. We are recording this interview for both the radio show and podcast and NC Family’s weekly video updates. If you’re interested in seeing the video version of this interview, sign up as part of our email list at NCfamily.org and you will receive an email when they are online every week. Our guests today are here to give us an update on this session of the North Carolina General Assembly. John Rustin is president of NC Family and Jerry Royall is NC Family’s Counsel. Both spend a lot of time at the General Assembly keeping an eye on what’s happening and working to influence laws on behalf of the families in our state. It’s amazing that when you hear about all of these important bills in the media, they’re portrayed as radical. But as we know when we actually read the text of the bills, which of course are always available to us on the NC legislature’s website at ncleg.gov, we find they’re actually common sense and reasonable. So let’s talk about some of those bills. Well, let’s talk first about a victory. There was a pro life victory in the legislature. What happened?
JOHN RUSTIN
Yes, well, there was and hopefully as you’re aware, we have had a great pro life victory in North Carolina. Senate Bill 20—The Care for Women, Children, and Families Act was passed by the legislature, of course was vetoed by Governor Roy Cooper, and the legislature overrode the governor’s veto. This bill is a major pro life victory in North Carolina. It essentially reduces the gestational age for illegal abortions in North Carolina from 20 weeks to 12 weeks. Of course, at the onset of the session, we were advocating strongly for a heartbeat bill in North Carolina, which would have reduced the legal gestational age for abortion about six weeks, it was clear as this bill and discussions were going on in both the House and the Senate, that that just was unfortunately not going to happen, and so they settled on 12 weeks. But this bill contains a lot of other provisions that will protect life in North Carolina, and also that will provide resources to give women and families that are facing crisis and unplanned pregnancies every reason to choose life instead of choosing abortion. Jere, do you have any other perspective?
JERE ROYALL
As you said, yeah, that was a compromise. We obviously wanted, and many others wanted, conception to be the time when the unborn child is protected. But there were a lot of good provisions that were added along with the 12 week restriction.
JOHN RUSTIN
And Traci, this bill is is literally going to save thousands of lives every year, and is going to again, provide resources. There’s $160 million dollars appropriated in this bill for improvements and enhancements to foster care, to adoption, to maternal care and lots of other important services in North Carolina, again, to give women and families that are facing crisis and unplanned pregnancies every reason to choose life. And so we’re really excited about it.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Yeah, and I think it answers some of those critiques from the other side that all we care about is getting the baby born. So this is providing a lot of those services.
JOHN RUSTIN
Absolutely, absolutely. And that’s so critical, because there are going to be more and more women carrying a child to term and we need to provide those practical services to them and also support in lots of different ways. So yeah.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Well let’s talk about going forward, then, there are a lot of bills that are important to North Carolina families that are being considered, talk about what those are.
JOHN RUSTIN
Well, a major bill is the Parents’ Bill of Rights, which I know a lot of our viewers and listeners care about. This bill clarifies and codifies parents fundamental rights to the care, custody, and control – using kind of legal terms – of their children, particularly in the arenas of education and health care. So this bill, Senate Bill 49, passed the Senate in early February and is awaiting action in the House. And we’re very, very hopeful that the house is going to take this bill up and pass it because parents do have a fundamental right to the care and upbringing of their children. But because that’s being challenged in lots of areas, especially in education and in health care, this bill does need to pass.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Okay, how about Opportunity Scholarships?
JERE ROYALL
Well, this is an area where more and more people are realizing we need to offer choices in education, and there’s great support across the state for this. So both chambers, the House and the Senate have bills proposing that. The House actually passed their version, the Senate version was not voted on, would expand things even more. Their’s actually would include all income levels. Now it would be on a sliding scale, the amount of these grants, but because the bill has not been taken up, many people are talking about the fact that it will be put in the state budget, which is what has happened in recent years. But either way, there is going to be a significant expansion of the scholarship grants, not an unlimited amount, but they are going to continue to increase the availability of these scholarships.
JOHN RUSTIN
Yeah, so expanding eligibility, so more children, more families will be able to choose the educational environment that’s best for their children, and also forward funding as the legislature is done so that there are appropriations set aside for Opportunity Scholarships for years in advance. So we’re really excited about this initiative, and the legislature is really continuing making North Carolina one of the leading states in the nation in school choice.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
So this is what critics have hammered on is the all income levels, that you’re going to be providing these scholarships, which have in the past may have been for people who are low income or who’ve had special needs children. So now we’re giving scholarships and taking these rich kids and paying for them to go to private schools. What’s the truth in that?
JERE ROYALL
Well, I mean it is but it’s on a sliding scale. But the reality is people are saying taxpayers are putting money into the state fund, and so it only makes sense that if people are choosing for their children to take another path that some of those resources should follow the child. I understand your point people are making but the reality is doesn’t it make sense to let resources but not as much of the state resources follow the child as they go to various schools?
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Okay. The next one, I think is Fairness in Women’s Sports Act.
JOHN RUSTIN
Yes, and this bill is really designed to protect the health and safety of female athletes in middle school, high school, and college by designating sports teams as either male, female or CO Ed based on biological sex. And so there were similar bills introduced in both the State Senate and the State House, those bills passed their chamber of origin. So the Senate bill passed the Senate, the House bill passed the House, but neither chamber has taken up the other chambers bill yet. So since there is clearly support in both chambers for this legislation, we fully anticipate that this bill will be taken up in either the House or the Senate, and that bill will be passed.
JERE ROYALL
Quick note on that, John, that doesn’t normally happen. Usually, one chamber passes a bill sends it over to the other. In this case, as you say they did pass their own version. The main difference is the House version includes college sports, so it remains to be seen how they’re going to work out that difference.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Okay, so this is primarily about transgender individuals trying to play on a sport that doesn’t match their birth gender. So we’ve got another bill that’s similar prohibiting gender surgeries on minors. What’s happening with that?
JOHN RUSTIN
Right, well, this is House Bill 808, which passed the House in early May, has not been considered by the Senate yet. The original version of this bill, and there’s a companion Senate bill, would prohibit the administration of puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, and the performance of gender reassignment surgeries on minors in North Carolina. So the House took up their bill, they took out the puberty blockers or the chemical portions and kept it as just prohibiting cross sex surgeries on minors and sent that bill over to the Senate. We’re hopeful that the Senate will take up their version of the bill or reinstate the chemical treatment prohibition as part of this bill. Because these drugs, these chemicals, and these surgical procedures are irreversible and sterilize the individuals who receive these services. And it’s just not a good thing for especially our youth to be subjected to. And so individuals who are dealing with gender dysphoria certainly need support, they need compassion, they need care, but they don’t need irreversible surgeries and chemicals in their bodies.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Okay, so these two bills are not proof that Republicans hate transgender individuals, is that what you’re saying?
JOHN RUSTIN
Yes, that is correct.
JERE ROYALL
It is, it’s showing true care for people. As John said, they’re permanent changes. There’s no proof. I mean, more and more. We’ve seen it over in Europe, other parts of the world that they’ve been on this path and have seen, they’re coming with negative outcomes. This is bringing harm to people’s lives. So it is, it’s really showing compassion. One other quick note too, John, it remains to be seen how their work out the difference, the House version did still have a provision in there, even though it didn’t keep the chemical part, where no state funding would go towards any kinds of treatments.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Yeah, it is interesting that the United States is doing much more radical things with individuals who believe themselves to be transgender than even European countries. Some of these countries we expect to be far out there.
JOHN RUSTIN
And Traci, in a related bill, there’s also legislation that would protect the rights of conscience of healthcare providers in North Carolina. It’s a very broad bill, but part of the intention of the bill is to address and protect physicians and others in the healthcare industry from being forced to engage and participate in these kinds of administration of drugs and surgeries on minors. So that is House Bill 819, the Medical Ethics Defense Act. We do have conscience protections in North Carolina protecting doctors, physicians, health care providers from participating in abortions. And this would extend that in a much broader sense. So we are hopeful that this bill will be taken up because that’s really important not only to prohibit minors from participating, but if adults are seeking these kinds of treatments that, if a healthcare provider objects to it on religious, ethical or moral grounds, they should not be forced to participate in it. So another important bill.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Okay. So the final one that our organization is watching is called The REACH Act, and as someone who loves history and thinks that we all need to learn more about our Founding Fathers and some of the founding documents, I love this one. But explain what that is.
JOHN RUSTIN
Well, The REACH Act would require three credit hours of instruction on American government and our founding documents as a prerequisite for graduation from North Carolina universities and community colleges. So the title of the bill is Reclaiming College Education on America’s Constitutional Heritage, the acronym for that is REACH, so that’s where The REACH Act comes from. And there were bills introduced in both chambers to do this. There have been discussions, but no final action taken yet on this legislation by the General Assembly.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Right, and why is this important?
JERE ROYALL
Well, as we’re seeing now, they’ve done surveys and asked people basic questions about government. And sadly, the responses are almost shocking. And this is where people are going, “Okay, we see this is a problem.” As citizens of this country, we need to understand our system of government, we all need to participate. And that’s what course we’re about. And we appreciate the fact that so many of you work together with us within our government. But if people don’t understand how the government system works, they’re not as likely to be involved and interested. And so this is an important part of helping people see what does it mean to be a citizen of this country, of this state?
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
Right. And I think this is why it’s important for all of us to be an educated electorate. This is why getting involved with NC Family, signing up for those emails and actually reading them when they go into your email box is important because you’re continuing to educate yourself and how you can be active.
JOHN RUSTIN
We’ve got a couple more issues to talk about. I know we’re running short on time. Of course, gambling has been a huge focus of the legislature. Unfortunately in recent weeks, as we are having our discussion today, the sports gambling and horse racing bill has passed the General Assembly and has been sent to the governor. He is expected to sign the bill in the coming days. And it’s just very unfortunate because we know the tremendously negative impact that the legalization of sports gambling in North Carolina is going to have, especially on our young adults and youth. The legislature is also considering bills and discussing bills that would place casinos in North Carolina and also legalize Video Lottery terminals or basically video poker machines under the auspices of the state lottery, we are fighting these bills like the dickens and I’m just heartbroken to see the sports gambling bill and the horse racing bill pass the legislature. If this is an issue that is of concern to you, please keep your eyes and ears open for alerts from the Family Policy Council as we move further into the session, because these bills are likely to come up quite quickly.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
And then the last one is medical marijuana, which I think is just ridiculous that we’re actually still talking about this. We know all the evidence that shows that it’s not healthy to have this legalized marijuana. Talk about what’s happening in North Carolina.
JERE ROYALL
Well, it passed earlier this year in the Senate as the House has not brought it up yet. We and you and many others continue to inform our members of the legislature of the house, just as you’re saying Traci, about the realities. All major medical groups are saying, “No, let us be the ones who approve medications. This we’re finding harm, not help.” And again, thank you for your involvement, because the more they’re hearing, the more they’re being encouraged with the facts and the truth. We’re understanding that opposition is continuing to grow. So this coming week, we’ve heard they may be voting in the House within the caucus of Republicans where if it’s defeated there, then that will be the end of the bill, which is what needs to happen. So we all are going to keep working together to inform, encourage them which goes back to your whole point about being involved with government, looking out for our neighbor, caring for one another. This is one more way we can do that.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS
And y’all it’s so valuable that we have these people up there, you know, advocating on our behalf. So thank you very much for all the good work that you guys do.
JOHN RUSTIN
Thank you, Traci. I appreciate that.
– END –
Spotify • Apple Podcasts • iHeart Radio • Audacy • Amazon Music
Family Policy Matters
Transcript: The Problems With Feminism
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Thanks for joining us this week for Family Policy Matters. Edith Stein once said, “The world doesn’t need what women have; it needs what women are.” Well, this statement seems even more poignant today. For 60 years, feminism has been the prevailing narrative for women in Western societies. But after more than a half-century, the fruits of this philosophy are disappointing at best.
Well, today’s guest argues that feminism has, in some ways, even been responsible for erasing women. Dr. Carrie Gress is a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, she’s a scholar at the Institute for Human Ecology at the Catholic University of America, and she’s a homeschooling mother of five. She joins us today to discuss her newest book, The End of Woman: How Smashing the Patriarchy Has Destroyed Us. Dr. Carrie Gress, welcome back to Family Policy Matters.
CARRIE GRESS: Thanks so much. It’s great to be back.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: You’ve got a very serious allegation here in the title of that book. And I know among conservatives, feminism is often a bad word. But it hasn’t always been the case, right? There are roots of feminism that were much different than we see now. So, talk a little bit about what good has been done and how did it become what it has morphed into today.
CARRIE GRESS: No, I think that’s the big question, the one that I really tried to answer with this book. I had initially done some research on the second wave of feminism, but I had always been told that the first wave was really good and promoted great things. And so I thought, you know, I just need to go back and look at this myself and sort of dig into it. And I think, actually, the surprising thing is what the research uncovered looking at original sources, secondary sources that were sympathetic to these original sources, early feminism, first wave, was actually pretty bad and had a lot of problems that I think have been carried over to really make fertile soil for what happened with a second wave. But I think fundamentally, you know, going back to even the 1790s when Mary Wollstonecraft is writing and then her son-in-law, who she never met, but Percy Shelley and his wife, Mary Shelley, who wrote Frankenstein, that there was some major issues that were happening in first wave feminism that I think have been polished over largely.
But the initial one is really the question I’ve asked; it wasn’t how do we help women as women? It was how do we help make women like men because they saw that men had much easier, they believe, much easier lives than women did. And so that was really the goal. So when you start looking at feminism as a whole with that question in mind, then I think it really makes sense to sort of start piecing together what’s happened in the first wave that few people know about, but then in the second wave, and then of course, now with the whole trans issue is this real change in what it means to be a woman.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Okay, so very interesting. So, you disagree with the fact that there were good roots to the feminist movement. Do you want to give us a little bit of, I guess, a nod, at least to the accomplishments that women have made since feminism began?
CARRIE GRESS: Well, I think absolutely, you know, the feminist movement has done things like promote voting; it’s also helped women with issues like custody. I mean, this is one of the tragedies of reading through older material about women and seeing just how difficult women’s lives were, largely because of their fertility or because if you had a bad husband, he was the one that maintain custody of children. So these are obviously tragic things. And many of them have been corrected. Of course, we even, you know, look at the workplace. And I work, and I have an advanced degree; I’m incredibly grateful for those opportunities. But I think, on the whole, feminism itself as a movement is really an ideology that, in many respects, has undermined itself and has undermined women and has done a lot more damage than good.
If you look at, certainly the statistics that we see on women now, in terms of women’s happiness, I think even, of course, the abortion issue is a huge one. We would not see in any way, shape, or form the kinds of numbers that we have on abortion that we see today if women were not told over and over again by feminism that children and husbands are an obstacle to happiness. So, really, this idea of this myth of this independent woman who could have this amazing life without any kind of family that actually goes back to the early 1810s. And it was first formulated by Percy Shelley, the English poet, and this character named Cythna. So it’s really interesting when you start really digging into it and seeing all these patterns that emerge. And it definitely begs the question, did we really have to destroy Western civilization and what we’re seeing so much of today in terms of decadence in order for these things to happen? And I think the answer is no, we didn’t need feminism in the form that it came down to us to see these great advancements for women.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: So you suggest that feminism has made male lives the norm for everyone, devalued the typical attributes and, virtues and strengths of women. So, talk more about how that looks.
CARRIE GRESS: I first started really digging into this question years and years ago when my probably three or four-year-old daughter asked me what was better about being a woman, and I just didn’t have an answer. And I was really disappointed in myself because I loved being a mom; I was a stay-at-home mom at that point, and I just didn’t feel like I had a good answer. And so again, when you start digging into the research, and into this question of what has happened with women, you really see, certainly, I mean, obviously, I’m trying to give a very superficial read on this, but the details are so much more rich, obviously, in the book. But when you look at what communism specifically has done women, Marxism. Marxism has tried to make women into great workers. And initially, feminism didn’t seem could work with a movement.
And then later on, certainly the work of Betty Friedan, we see this major transition happened where Friedan is trying to get women out of their homes, which she called concentration camps, and into the workplace doing productive work there. She was absolutely communist, and that was, I think, one of the areas of research that was really the most interesting, because she always said that she was just a housewife and wasn’t really interested in women’s issues until the 50s. And her biography obviously tells a very different story of real involvement with the communists. So what’s happened is this idea of making women into workers. Still, also, you know, the free love aspect of the movement has been there really, almost from the very beginning, this idea that women should be able to have sexual relationships the way that men do without the very long-term consequences that come with pregnancy and raising children and whatnot.
So that was the idea is the feminist ideology really embraced both this concept of getting women to work as a good Marxist, and then also for this free love notion. And then finally, of course, there’s this whole added layer of the occult that was brought into the movement and very much kind of a part of it over the years; you can see it sort of wane and wax in different ways, but certainly came to the fore in the 70s. And I think even now that we can see so much evidence, even TV shows, The Good Witch, and you know, this kind of concept that there could be a good witch. And you know, astrology, and horoscopes, and all these kinds of different ways in which women are encouraged to dabble in things is absolutely part of what has been given to us through this ideology.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: You have some shocking testimonies in your book.
CARRIE GRESS: Yeah. The earliest ones were really from women that were on the receiving end of kind of this free-love attitude that took place in the 1800s. Mary Shelley is one of them, and her stepsister, who had a relationship with Lord Byron. I mean, these are two women, Mary Shelley’s obviously married to Percy Shelley. And so they both had children with these men who were very much involved in free love and breaking every kind of taboo that they could. And both of them, I mean, it’s just heartbreaking to read about the number of children that died between them, that the stories of these young children dying from not being treated well or being pushed to move to places that they shouldn’t have gone when they were sick, or you know, things like that.
And it’s interesting because in the 1800s, you still have the feminist movement still talks about the beauty and the center relationship between mother and child; that all changes in the 1900s. It’s very difficult to find a testimony of a feminist woman talking about this relationship between mother and child and the importance of it, the tenderness; it all turns to this one word, drudgery, which is just used over and over and over again, you know, the drudgery of motherhood is all we hear about.
So those are the early stages. And then, of course, you move on to later stages. And I’ve been featured in the book Stevie Nicks, who, of course, is well known for being on a stinking iMac and whatnot. And just this interview that was done with her in the 90s. And it’s just amazing. She had had four abortions, and she didn’t want to have any children because she believed that she had a responsibility to her job and the people that work for her, and she just didn’t want to give up working. So, I think it was four different abortions for different fathers, all of the relationships ended. And Stevie Nicks, in this 90s interview, actually looks like a little girl. Like she talks, her house is very cutesy, and whenever she goes on tour, people have to go ahead of her to her hotels to make sure they have sort of this cute doll house appearance to them. And you know, it’s just the kind of thing where you just realize, obviously, this woman has done a lot of drugs over the years, and I think was finally clean when that interview was done. But this is, the psychological damage that was done on this woman is just unreal. And I think there’s a lot more of that than we even realize in terms of mental illness. We know there’s lots of depression, and all of these kinds of things can really be sourced back in many respects to abortion and to this rejection, really, of what it means to mother someone else. And this has obviously been promoted so much by the culture and the ideology.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Why have we not heard a lot about this?
CARRIE GRESS: Several things going on. First of all, the women that would be aware of it are academics, and their careers could be in jeopardy; the advantage I had is I don’t have a tenure position that I’m trying to protect. I’m largely a stay-at-home mom, and that’s really, you know if everything else went away. I would still be happy to be a stay-at-home mom, so I didn’t feel threatened in that respect.
The other thing is, is that I think the left has done an amazing job of both characterizing their own position as the correct position that women should take. But they’ve also characterized what they articulate as the position against them. So, if you think about every time there’s an abortion issue, who do you see? You see all those women in the red robes and the red bonnets, you know, the Margaret Atwood kind of Handmaid’s Tale images, because what they’re trying to communicate is that if you are not a feminist and with them, then you must be this kind of woman who’s bought into infertility cult and might as well just go buy yourself a red robe right now, you know, so they, they’ve been amazing and masterful in terms of defining the opposition, they’ve also been able to make us look like doormats, or we’re ignorant or backwards or whatever.
So most women, I think, don’t really even have a sense that there could be something other than those two categories. Because we don’t really see it in culture, we see one extreme or the other. And we don’t really have that sort of the mental hooks to really say, no, there’s actually a healthy way in between both of those. And we need to start seeing it.
We don’t see it in the media, we don’t see it in magazines, you know, anything like that. So I think that’s why there’s been just, first of all, a lot of reticence to try to articulate or to move against feminism because it just feels like you’re really putting yourself out there in this very unfashionable and weird world. Still, the other thing is, is that there’s a lot of polish on these women and these histories. And you know, Elizabeth Cady Stanton is made out to look like she’s this, you know, heroine. And when you really start looking at what Cady Stanton was up to, and the amount of mediums that she was using and seances. You know, all of these scandals that ended up actually getting kicked out of the organization that she founded. These are the kinds of tales that are not being told in our history classes or history books,
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: I have a lot of other questions, but we’re getting to the end of our interview, and I don’t want to leave without giving you an opportunity to tell us what we can do. Are there some positive ways that we can address some of these very serious concerns that you’re raising in this book,
CARRIE GRESS: I think the first thing is we have to just really let go of the term feminism. I know so many of us have tried to find ways to really make it fit with Christianity, but when you know the defining characteristics of it are the occult, free love, and smashing the patriarchy, there’s just nothing compatible with it. You know, if women do use the word, I think they have to be absolutely specific about what they mean by it. Because the regnant belief is built into those three concepts from the very beginning, almost. So I think that’s huge.
I think the other thing that we can do is just really start coming back to this idea of really understanding that our happiness is embedded in our families, that this is the sad story of so much of what I hear these days are women who have been living the feminist worldview. And they get to a certain point and say, “Why did I do this? It’s too late; I don’t have a family, I don’t have a husband. I might have a good bank account, but that’s not going to get me through the rest of these years in a way in which I dreamed.”
So I think that that’s the other aspect is really just start focusing on the gifts that we do have as women and the ways in which we can contribute, obviously, biologically, as mothers, and I think this is a missing piece is recognizing that all women are made to be mothers, whether it’s biologically, psychologically or spiritually. And to really press into that and see we have these incredible gifts that we can pass on to people because what does the mother do? She nourishes, provides shelters, she tries to create a place in which people can grow into the people they are meant to be, the people that God made them to be. So, I think that’s a pretty exciting vocation when we start reframing it within that context. And instead of all this emphasis on ourselves, and we start saying, “How do I use my gifts to help others?” And, of course, we know that fundamentally, the real key to happiness is that gift itself to others, not in a codependent, sort of creepy way that the feminists have articulated, but in a real beautiful Christian way in which we use our gifts that God gave us to help bring out the gifts and others.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: All right, Carrie Gress, author of the new book The End of Woman: How Smashing the Patriarchy Has Destroyed Us, where can our listeners go to follow your work and learn more?
CARRIE GRESS: The best place is my website, CarrieGress.com, or I have a blog called TheologyofHome.com. And the book can also be purchased if you want a signed copy from TheologyofHome.com. So those are the best places.
TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: All right, Dr. Carrie Gress, thank you so much for being with us today on Family Policy Matters.
– END –