Historically, publicly funded schools, such as charter schools, have not been affiliated with a religion. One school in Oklahoma is attempting to become a charter school, and is asking why state resources are denied to them on the basis of their religion. This raises the question of whether there can be Christian charter schools.

This week on Family Policy Matters, host Traci DeVette Griggs welcomes Phil Sechler, Senior Counsel and Director of the Center for Free Speech at Alliance Defending Freedom, to discuss a legal case in Oklahoma that would make St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School the first religious charter school in the country.

• Subscribe to our podcast so you can hear our interviews every week.
• Tune in to one of the radio stations that carry Family Policy Matters (see the list below).
• Click below to listen online.

Spotify • Apple Podcasts • iHeart Radio • Audacy • Amazon Music

Family Policy Matters
Can Charter Schools be Religious? With Phil Sechler

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Thanks for joining us this week for Family Policy Matters. Charter schools have been an integral part of the growth of school choice in many states across the country as public schools. The understanding has historically been the charter schools must be non religious environments, but that assumption is being challenged by a lawsuit out of Oklahoma that The US Supreme Court will be considering this year. The Alliance Defending Freedom or ADF, is representing the Oklahoma statewide charter school board in their defense of a decision to approve the nation’s first religious Charter School, Saint Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School. We’re joined today by ADF Senior Counsel and Director of the Center for Free Speech at Alliance Defending Freedom. Phil Sechler, welcome to Family Policy Matters.

PHIL SECHLER: Thank you, Traci, it’s nice to be here.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: All right. Well, interesting story. St Isidore is a Catholic school and was approved as a charter school. So how did that come about, that it was approved in the first place?

PHIL SECHLER: St Isidore started as an organization formed by the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa, and they started St Isidore. They sent a letter to the statewide virtual charter school board of Oklahoma, which was responsible for all online charter schools. And St Isidore was going to be a virtual school, and they indicated that they wanted to take advantage of the Oklahoma program for virtual charter schools. The board, of course, had a provision in its governing statute that said that schools could not be affiliated with a religious organization or have a religious program. So they contacted the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, asked the attorney general for advice, and the attorney general wrote that the restriction on religious organizations was likely unconstitutional and couldn’t be enforced in light of three Supreme Court cases that have been coming down the last few years indicating that a state cannot discriminate against a religious group in programs it offers to other private groups. So then, as St Isidore is getting its application to be a charter school together, that attorney general loses an election and a new attorney general comes in and withdraws that opinion. In any event, the application is submitted, the board takes a very hard look at it, actually rejects the first application because of some concerns about the educational program, have a robust back and forth. St Isidore revises the application, a very lengthy application, very robust criteria, a lot of process in approving the application. And finally, the Board concluded, even though the new attorney general came in and withdrew the prior advice, that they could not discriminate against St Isidore because it’s Catholic. They needed to evaluate it the same way it would evaluate any other applicant. And because this was a very quality program, the board decided to approve St Isidore in June of 2023.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Okay, so is St Isadore the first religious school to apply for and or be granted school charter?

PHIL SECHLER: So certainly, in Oklahoma, it is. Some states do allow charter schools to be affiliated with religious organizations. Oklahoma, under the statute, does not. But even in those states where charter schools can be affiliated with a religious organization, as far as we know, no school in the United States has had a religious curriculum. So, this would be the first school where the educational curriculum had a religious component to it.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: All right, so the case that you all are a part of is between the Oklahoma charter school board and the Oklahoma attorney general. St Isidor is not a part of that, so explain the whole reasoning behind that.

PHIL SECHLER: So St Isidore is a part of that, but it came later. But the suit did start, just as a matter with the attorney general and the board, because the attorney general sued the board. So the attorney general of Oklahoma, after the board approved St Isidore and entered a charter contract with St Isidore, the attorney general sued and to have the contract rescinded. And so that was the attorney general’s choice in terms of naming the board as the defendant. Went right to the Oklahoma Supreme Court, and then St Isidore intervened. So now, and St Isidore was a party when we were in the Oklahoma Supreme Court, and now St Isidore had a petition they filed from that ruling along with the board, so both the board and St Isidore now are parties.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Okay, so tell us why you agree with the reasoning that Oklahoma charter school board used to approve St Isidore.

PHIL SECHLER: Yeah. I mean, the Supreme Court’s made it clear that the Free Exercise clause means that you cannot condition a public benefit or program on somebody giving up the religious views. And that’s essentially what this Oklahoma program, if the statute were enforced, does, and that is, it says, Look, you can apply to operate a charter school, or you can be religious, but you can’t do both. So, it’s essentially asking people to give up their religious views as a cost for becoming part of the program. That’s unconstitutional, and as I said before, the Supreme Court has made that crystal clear in a number of cases over the last few years. And the only real argument that the Oklahoma Supreme Court advanced as to why those cases don’t apply is it held that St Isidore is a government actor and a state actor, two different things, but essentially meaning St Isidore doesn’t have rights under the Constitution, which is crazy, because it was formed, as I said, by the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa. It was privately formed. Submitted an application to have a contract with the state to run a school, but then it would be operated privately as well. Has a board all privately appointed. It is in no way a creature of the state of Oklahoma, so that’s wrong, and if you take out that error of the lower court, it’s clear that the cases at the Supreme Court has already decided, meaning that you can’t discriminate against St Isidore simply because it’s Catholic when you consider applications for a program

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: All right, and the difference between St Isidore, operating as a public charter school and a public school is that no one is forced to go to the charter school. Is that correct?

PHIL SECHLER: That’s one of many differences, right? I mean, there are a lot of differences between St Isidore in a traditional public school. I mean, first of all, St Isidore is not going to be operated by a school district. But also, you’re absolutely right. It’s a total, totally voluntary alternative for families in Oklahoma.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: So how did this case get to the US Supreme Court, and why is it so important that they take this on?

PHIL SECHLER: It got to the Supreme Court because we filed a petition asking the court to review the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s decision. St Isidore did too, and both petitions were granted. And so, the court decided to hear the matter which it will on April 30, because it deems the case to be important for one reason or the other. And it is important first, because the Free Exercise Clause is clear that a state can’t ask somebody to give up their religion as a price of becoming part of a program, and a state can’t deem private actors to be part of the government as an end run around those cases. So, it’s important both as a matter of the Free Exercise Clause, and as a matter of what’s called the state action doctrine.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: When do you expect to have a resolution to this case?

PHIL SECHLER: We would expect this case will be decided by the end of June this year, 2025.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: And will that mean that St Isidore, if they do prevail, will be able to become a school next year? Is that leaving them enough time?

PHIL SECHLER: I don’t think it’s enough time for 2025 and I think they’ve already indicated that, but certainly for the 2026 school year, we would expect that they would be open.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Okay, and of course, the outcomes are, what just yes or no, I mean, or is there some gray area there?

PHIL SECHLER: Yeah, I think the outcomes, pretty much, are whether or not the Supreme Court agrees with the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s decision, which basically ordered that the charter contract be revoked on the grounds asserted by the Attorney General, which we think are erroneous, or whether the court reverses that because it was incorrect. And St Isidore does have free exercise rights, and therefore can’t be discriminated against simply because of its religious views.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: If the Supreme Court rules in the favor of St Isidore, would we see this reverberate across the country

PHIL SECHLER: In the states where the state invites private applicants to apply to operate a charter school, absolutely. Not every state does it the same way, and this only goes in so far as there’s a private applicant seeking approval. But to the extent that a state, any state, has a program that it opens to secular applicants to establish charter schools, then it would have to allow religious applicants to apply as well. On the same terms.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Let’s talk about the importance of this case, then, I mean, is this a topic or an issue whose time has come?

PHIL SECHLER: It is really important for the court to make clear that states cannot put religious groups in kind of a second-class category. They can’t treat religious groups differently than they treat other private groups, and that’s exactly what the Free Exercise clause says, and that’s what the Supreme Court, we hope, will say with respect to St Isidore, also, this is such an important case in terms of educational freedom. You know, there, it’s great to have school choice, and the Oklahoma charter school program is a great way for Oklahomans to have options other than traditional public schools. So, the fact that St Isidore could offer a Catholic virtual school for families who are in rural areas, who need that option and who want that option is terrific. So, this is a case that is important just to allow educational freedom in the way families choose to educate their children.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: So why do you suppose we’re still having these debates? I mean, they come up very frequently, this balance between religious freedom, religious rights and the government. Why can’t we get this right, do you suppose?

PHIL SECHLER: Yeah, I think there’s such a view that the public schools should be the option, and there’s kind of a resistance to these alternatives, even though many families choose them. So here, as we talked about before, Traci, St Isidore would only have students if families choose to go there. And in fact, St Isidore would only get state funds if families choose to go. There many families do. And in fact, there were many families signed up to attend St Isidore before the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled in June of 2024 that it couldn’t open and the contract needed to be rescinded.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: So our religious citizens, are we somewhat to blame for this, because we’re just accepting of this ability for the state to set these very bold lines?

PHIL SECHLER: Yeah, it could be that this is an issue that certainly could have been raised earlier by a group that wanted to establish a charter school. And any of the states that have the charter school program, and that’s actually 45 states plus the District of Columbia, all have charter school programs. But you know, we are here now, and that’s great news, and hopefully the Supreme Court will make it clear that religious applicants are entitled to the same neutral treatment that other applicants get. And so hopefully, with a decision from the Supreme Court by June of 2025, that will give everyone in the country who has access to these programs guidance and clarity in terms of how to move forward.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: Well, we’re about out of time before we go. Phil Sechler, where can our listeners go to follow this case and all the other great work that you all are doing over there at Alliance Defending Freedom?

PHIL SECHLER: ADFLegal.org is our website, and it has links to every one of the cases we’re doing, including this case, which is called Drummond v. the Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board. And there probably will be a live stream on the date of argument, which is April 30. And a lot of other work is being done by our organization, and so your listeners can find out about what we do at the website, ADFLegal.org.

TRACI DEVETTE GRIGGS: All right. Phil Sechler, Director of the Center for Free Speech at Alliance Defending Freedom. Thanks so much for being with us today on Family Policy Matters.

PHIL SECHLER: Thank you so much, Traci, it’s been great being here.

– END –